Zohran Mamdani ERUPTS After Greg Gutfeld EXPOSES His DIRTY SECRETS on Live TV!
.
Zohran Mamdani ERUPTS After Greg Gutfeld EXPOSES His DIRTY SECRETS on Live TV!

Ever wonder what happens when a world-class city spirals into political chaos in slow motion? New York has been living it, and Greg Gutfeld just took a chainsaw to the polished image of its latest “Democratic Socialist” star, Zohran Mamdani.
In a segment that is already setting the internet on fire, Gutfeld moved past the typical political pleasantries to expose what he calls the “hangover of wokeism.” It wasn’t just a critique; it was a full-scale dismantling of a politician Gutfeld describes as a “trust fund communist douchebag.”
The “Columbia Grift”: Identity for Sale?
The most explosive revelation in Gutfeld’s monologue centers on Mamdani’s 2009 application to Columbia University. According to Gutfeld, the “socialist” hero—who now identifies as a champion for the oppressed—allegedly identified as “black or African-American” on his application.
Gutfeld’s punchline hit like a freight train: “I guess there was no box for trust fund communist douchebag.” The segment raised a question that many in New York’s middle class have been whispering: How can you claim to be oppressed when you voluntarily choose an identity because you know it grants you preferential treatment? Gutfeld framed it not as a misunderstanding, but as a “calculating grift”—using a false disadvantage to skip the “velvet rope” of Ivy League admissions.
“The Hangover of Heinous Ideas”
Gutfeld didn’t stop at Mamdani’s past. He took aim at the current state of New York City under the influence of far-left policies. He described the city as a “monopoly” of one-party rule where voters are forced to choose between “bad and worse.”
His description of the Mamdani era was brutal:
- Infrastructure: Subways that look like “abstract art” due to delays.
- Public Safety: A “decade of heinous ideas” where repeat criminals are treated as victims.
- The “Woke” Monopoly: A city where “brain damage is considered a plus” for political advancement.
The All-Female Transition Team and “The Naked Goat”
In typical Gutfeld fashion, the humor turned surreal to highlight the absurdity of modern identity politics. He mocked Mamdani’s announcement of an “all-female transition team,” snarking, “At least we think they’re female.” He even joked that since Mamdani’s rise, the iconic “Naked Cowboy” in Times Square has already been replaced by a “Naked Goat,” and every play on Broadway has been replaced by a lecture. The humor hit hard because it spoke to a real sense of “cultural exhaustion” felt by New Yorkers who are tired of every facet of life being politicized.
Capitalism vs. Santa Claus Socialism
The heart of Gutfeld’s argument was the disconnect between Mamdani’s “idealism” and the systems that actually make New York function.
“For leftists like Zoran, they only see the goals, not the systems. To him, the free stuff just appears. In this case, Santa is socialism and the taxpayers are the elves.” — Greg Gutfeld
Gutfeld pointed out the irony of a politician who disdains capitalism while living off the fruits of it. He argued that the “diversity” Mamdani touts isn’t the cause of New York’s greatness, but a result of the capitalist system that Mamdani is currently trying to dismantle.
The Verdict: A House of Cards
As the segment concluded, the message was clear: enthusiasm isn’t a substitute for competence. Gutfeld portrayed Mamdani as a man “handpicked” by shadowy donors, lacking a resume, and “not even qualified to be a pool boy.”
While Mamdani’s supporters claim that “change takes time,” Gutfeld’s monologue served as a mirror to a city that is running out of patience. It was a saga of promises, pitfalls, and punchlines—and if Gutfeld is right, the “hangover” for New York is only just beginning.
What do you think? Is Gutfeld’s “trust fund socialist” critique fair, or is he being too hard on a politician trying to bring real change? Does the Columbia application story change your mind about Mamdani? Let us know in the comments!